|
This describes how to solve each side of a compound inequality, then using the graphs of each part determine the interval notation for the entire compound statement.
|
|
Presents a compound inequality where both sides have to be solved for the variable first, and then shows how to graph the simplified results
|
|
This contains one example of solving an inequality as described in the title.
|
|
Shows one example of solving a iinear inequality in two steps.
|
|
This states the Multiplicative Propery of Inequality, then demonstates how it works with two examples.
|
|
A demo that only shows a one step process of adding an integer to both sides of an inequality so that the variable stands alone and we can tell what values are true for that inequality.
|
|
A demonstration of how to deal with interpreting the union and intersection of two inequalities. For a more extensive and exhaustive demo, please view the videos entitled "Understanding…
|
|
A quick demonstration of how to interpret a line graph of a compound inequality and write its algebraic form.
|
|
This presents how to graph two inequalities that are connected by either the word "or" or the word "and"
|
|
Shows how to determine the boderline separating the side of the x-y graph that has true solutions from the side that does not. It is then shown how to decide whether that line should be dotted or…
|
|
Just an exercise in testing whether an ordered pair makes an inequality statement true when plugged in for the variables.
|
|
Demonstrating how to substitute several values for the variable in an inequality to see if they are valid solutions.
|
|
Translating a graph into an inequality statement.
|
|
This shows how written statments are not always written in the order that the mathematical equivalent is, so please listen to the explanation presented here.
|
|
This just describes how to translate a statement in words using the symbols for greater than, greater that or equal to, less than, and less than or equal to.
|
|
Shows how to graph an inequality that is different than the one in Part 1.
|